Twenty Tracks…too much fucking perspective
Friday, April 28th, 20064. A track that you like but wouldn’t want to be associated with in public
If I were to go through my entire collection of music, checking each artist, each album, each track and analyse and classify them according to the stringent criteria that constitutes cool, I’d rapidly come to the conclusion that just about everything I listen to falls into this category.
I don’t really care. The only good thing about getting older (not that I am, btw) is that not only do you usually have at least one friend whose taste in music is as diabolical as your own, but you’ve also perfected the art of admitting something with a slightly shamefaced and self deprecating air, acknowledging with a gentle half smile that you know it isn’t quite the done thing to like this particular song but; like the ability to refuse chocolate or your habit of chopping up babies to make into pate, it’s one of those things that you have no control over and this slight aberration in no way affects the fact that you are otherwise quite a nice person really.
However, while there are some tracks that I’ll quite cheerfully admit to liking (albeit with the slightly shamefaced and self deprecating manner described above), there are three tracks the names of which have never crossed my lips – no matter how drunk, drugged or in love I may have been. Indeed the only thing that would have got these names out of my usually supermotorised gob would have been the threat of dire and unspeakable torture (just the threat would do – I have a low pain threshold and no scruples)
Having said that, the first one could almost sneak into the admissible. Traffic– 40,000 Headmen. After all, it’s got Winwood on vocals, it’s got that whole mellow hippy flute thing going on, it’s got circular guitar and a walking bass line, hell, it’s even got maracas. What more could you possibly require. People have done a lot more with a lot less.
It’s the lyrics that let it down (although I must admit that they’re the thing I like best about the song.) I know that in the 60’s and early 70’s lyrics often were a bit strange, for example there’s Led Zep talking about the dork on Satans daughter (or at least it sounds like that, it might also be on his doorway. It only goes to show…) and meeting girls in Mordor, or Iron Butterfly singing “in da gadda da vida” (opinion is divided as to whether this was so titled because singer Doug Ingle was so stoned he couldn’t enunciate In the Garden of Life, because the drummer was wearing headphones when he was told the name of the song and misheard it, or – my personal favourite- they all had accents like Tony Curtis and that’s how they pronounced it).
Then you’ve got Traffic and their obsession with 40,000 headmen. Take the first verse.
“Forty thousand headmen couldn’t make me change my mind,
if I had to take the choice between the deafman and the blind,
I know just where my feet should go and that’s enough for me,
I turned around and knocked them down and walked across the sea”
For a start, why 40,000? Thirty thousand would have scanned just as well (as would twenty thousand or fifty thousand) and what are headmen anyway? Do they mean the headman of a village? Is it a convention? Do headmen of small villages have conventions? Do they discuss things like “whither now for voodoo?” or, “the difficulties of being a witch doctor in a multi faith society?” Do they have best kept villages competition with shrunken heads displayed hanging from every lamppost? And, why were they so vehement about changing his mind? He obviously didn’t want them to - to the extent that he knocked them all down. How he knocked them down, I don’t know – the logistics of this would be difficult. You’d need a really big car to knock down 40,000 headmen at once and you’d have to do it at once because otherwise the ones that were left would either run out of the way or be a bit angry and go for you. I get the walked across the sea bit – if it were a conference then it was obviously somewhere like Blackpool or Brighton so the sea would be so full of litter that you could leap from one empty can to the other like a polar bear skipping across an ice floe – but I’m still a bit puzzled as to how you’d fit 40,000 headmen into a conference hall in the first place.
It does become a little bit clearer in the second and third verses. I’m not going to quote them verbatim but basically after he’s walked a bit then he sees
“three ships sailing towards a distant shore”.
Our hero then lights up a cigarette and “follows in pursuit”
and
“…finds a secret cave where they obviously stashed their loot”
Now I take issue with this claim because I am a smoker. And one of the things I’ve discovered about smoking on the beach is that you can never ever light up a cigarette. For a start and no matter how tropical the beach, the matches are always damp. Of course he could have used a lighter, but I’ve found that the sand always seems to block up the flint mechanism so that when you flick the wheel bit with your thumb all you get is a sort of clicky sound and then it doesn’t turn anymore.
And that’s just on the beach. If you were actually walking across the sea, then surely some of the spray from the waves would either dampen the cigarettes so that they wouldn’t light, or soak the matchbook so that they wouldn’t light. Possibly a lighter would have been more useful here, but all the times I’ve ever been on the sea there’s been a brisk breeze blowing and so the bloody thing would keep going out and you never get your cigarette lit and there would have to be a breeze because he saw three ships go sailing and although I know very little about ships I’m presuming that the fact that they were sailing means that they had sails and you wouldn’t have the sail out (or whatever the proper terminology is) unless there was a breeze. I’m not going to be pedantic and point out that he must not only have been a bloody quick walker to catch up with the three ships but he’d also have to be invisible too, because otherwise the crew would have seen him coming and either offered him a lift or made him walk the plank. I think it’s more likely to be the second option, as law-abiding citizens don’t usually have secret caves where they stash loot, although I’d have thought the words secret and obvious were mutually exclusive in any case.
Mind you, our hero doesn’t seem to be a very law-abiding citizen anyway. Possibly there was some provocation for him knocking down the 40,000 headmen at the start but on discovering the loot, he doesn’t exactly phone for the local constabulary and hand it in. No. In his own words…
“Filling up my pockets, even stuffed it up my nose,
I must have weighed a hundred tons between my head and toes,
I ventured forth before the dawn had time to change its mind,
and soaring high above the clouds I found a golden shrine”
Now this verse confuses me a bit too. You see the classic explanation at this point is that the band were completely off their faces, hence the allusion to stuffing it up their noses (unless of course they had really bad colds and the headmen had stolen nasal decongestants) I don’t mind that. Rock bands are supposed to be off their face, that’s why we have them. What concerns me is the portage of the loot. Either he has a lot of pockets, or the loot is extremely heavy. Either way, it would have to be quite small to fit up his nose (unless of course he had abnormally large nostrils) and in any case I don’t see how, if he weighed a hundred tonnes after he’d loaded himself up, he was then able to take off and soar high above the clouds. Unless of course, the loot was actually bits of a 747 which would weigh about a hundred tonnes (if not more) but he doesn’t mention building a jet plane so I doubt it’s that. The only thing I can think of is that he’s one of these extreme sporting types. In which case deaths too good for him and I wish the headmen (who seem to have disappeared) had got him but good.
I’m also concerned by the indecisiveness of dawn. It’s not that I’m averse to change but I do like some things to go on as they’ve always done. Dawn is one of them. I can’t say that I’m usually up to see it, but it seems to be one of those things that give a certain amount of solidity to ones day and the thought that it can be quite arbitrary about whether or not it appears is worrying.
The golden shrine I can take or leave to be honest. We only have his word that that was what was up there, but why not? It seems far more likely to have a golden shrine above the clouds than a potting shed or dry cleaners. Apparently though, he had an appointment there because the final verse mentions that he rang the bell “hoping he hadn’t come too late” Now up to this point he seems to be a bit carefree about how he spends his time. He’s engaged in discussions with 40,000 headmen, he’s walked across the sea, he’s tracked ships and nicked loot and soared above the clouds and now all of a sudden he’s consulted his Blackberry and he’s late for an appointment? I don’t think so somehow.
As if by magic all these people now start to appear. Well only one person (who I suspect is also moonlighting as the doorkeeper to the hotel California because they both seem to share the same deliberately obtuse way of talking – although everyone did in the sixties) and he’s told to “not waste his time”. You see. That’s what happens when you “lay out your treasure before the iron gate”, people think you’re one of those door-to-door salesmen types and they just don’t want to know. I reckon I’m right in this theory because the doorkeeper adamantly refuses to give his name and when our hero presses him for it, tells him “Just look behind”.
This is where things start to get really silly and I begin to suspect that our hero is a big fat liar. Because now we’re expected to believe that all this time the 40,000 headmen have been following him with thoughts of revenge uppermost in their minds. Apparently they fire
“…twenty shotguns each and man, it really hurt.
But luckily for me they had to stop and then reload.
And by the time they’d done that I was heading down the road”
Now I’ve fired a shot gun (best not to ask really)and they’re bloody heavy. I suppose that if you were really tough you could fire one from each hand, but there’s absolutely no way that you could hold 20 shotguns at the same time. Not unless you had at least 10 pairs of arms (I think- maths is not one of my strongest points) and even if they did each have at least 10 pairs of arms (which I doubt because surely he’d have mentioned that at the beginning of the song) then the chances of surviving a rain of 1,600,000 bullets is pretty slim and surely they wouldn’t all have fired at exactly the same time anyway. Either he’s exaggerating the number of headmen or the number of shotguns (fair enough I suppose that if you were faced by 40,000 shotgun wielding headmen at point blank range then it might feel like they had 20 shotguns each) but either way, dismissing multiple gunshot wounds with “man they really hurt” is a bit macho to be taken seriously. They would fucking hurt and he’d certainly be in no fit state to head down a road (lets not even attempt to ask the question of why, if there was a road to this golden shrine and he had to be there for a specific time anyway, he decided to take the scenic route)
I blame my parents (this is not new, I have done ever since I read about Primal Therapy but its ok cos they’ve read about it to and they blame their parents and we’ve lent the book to them, so the buck will end with Adam and Eve) I found the bloody album in their record collection and since I’d also discovered Led Zeps Physical Graffiti and Pink Floyds Dark Side of the moon there I thought that Traffic would be ok. It quite obviously wasn’t. Don’t even get me started on “in a Shanghai Noodle factory”.
Next one up has a bit of a back-story. You see, you might know them as the international rock gods in the making/popular music combo that is Smith 6079(or as I’m talking about only 2 of them should that be Smith 3039.5?) but when I knew them they were nothing more than annoying schoolboys with squeaky voices, mullets and Iron Maiden t–shirts.
Not to blow my own trumpet here, but all this music stuff that they’re now thrusting on an unsuspecting and undeserving public? It’s all down to me. Was I not then herebes older sister? (A state of affairs which didn’t last long as I decided to stick at 27 while herebe bravely ventured forth in search of bigger birthdays) Was it not my stereo that blasted out the scared (that was a typo and should have been sacred, but actually scared is probably nearer the truth) music? Should they not, even now, be worshipping the ground I walk on and cheerfully handing over all their royalties? Yes, I think so to (hey – worth a try).
I mean obviously I didn’t teach them everything. I didn’t teach them how to play guitar (is the trauma of listening to someone learning how to play Joe Satriani something that you can claim for and if so do any of you know of a lawyer who will take the case) and I don’t think that I taught them how to drink themselves into oblivion, although they may have learnt from example and I certainly didn’t teach them to like Iron Maiden as I was strictly an AC/DC sort of girl (but only with Bon Scott – no reflection on Brian Johnson who is a stellar man doing a sterling job - and a Geordie to boot) and it was the law back then that if you liked one then you weren’t allowed to like the other. But I still maintain that their (Smith 6079’s) current success is due to my guiding hand.
Of course I’m referring to the blogger that is herebemonsters and his indomitable sidekick AndyH. Or it may be the other way round – AndyH and his indomitable sidekick herebemonsters…either way, in those days they came as a pair (there are rumours that they still do) and very pissed off at them most of the time I was too. You see, they were widdlers of the nth degree. They widdled constantly and not well. To make it so much worse, they had a whammy bar and neither knew how to use it. Whingie Malmsteen, Uli Jon Roth, the great Kat. - you name it, they bought it and what was worse, they attempted to play it too. Hell, they even bought “Guitar magazine” which has got to be unnatural.
A typical Saturday would be spent listening to the sound of three bars of Joe Satriani’s flying in a blue haze being played on the tape player, brutally stopped, rewound replayed, rewound and then painstakingly replayed by them every which way but correctly. Once they got that Boss effects pedal with every sound known to man pre-programmed and ready to use at the flip of a foot, then things became ten times worse. Because even though they still didn’t know how to play the guitar, they somehow thought that by flicking a switch and making it sound like whale song it would somehow miraculously turn out right. It didn’t. Thank God we didn’t live closer to the sea; as the sounds emanating from the house would have played havoc with any whale’s sense of direction.
In short, they were music nerds. I’m not saying that they bought Japanese imports but I’d bet good money that they did. They went into Newcastle and, instead of spending the day chasing hot babes around record shops, they clustered over the trays and deliberated for hours as to which album they would buy and after that, instead of going to the pub, or sitting on Eldon Green getting canned on cider – they would actually buy an album and go home.
It was after such a shopping trip that Herebe returned, clutching a fairly innocuous looking tape. Entitled Flex-Able, it was by a guitarist called Steve Vai(and it had a big sticker on the front declaring it an Import – so I reckon my money’s safe enough) I knew who Vai was of course. He was the flavour of the month for guitarists (headline in Guitar magazine - “Steve Vai, Passion and Warfare…”), having played on Dave Lee Roth’s first solo album Eat em and Smile and transcribed Frank Zappa, which should have put anyone off music for life. No disrespect to Zappa, Louisiana Hooker with Herpes (to the tune of Lucy in the sky with diamonds) is the best Beatles song they (n)ever wrote.
Flex-Able wasn’t so bad. At least it didn’t have too many widdley scrang bits in it and it did have vocals. I prayed that one of them wasn’t planning on taking up singing although maybe they should have done - the range that they each had was amazing, going from sub-bass to castrato, often in the same word.
What the tape did have was a song called “little green men” which is undoubtedly one of the most annoying songs ever written…For those of you who are unfamiliar with Vai’s oeuvre, I should just mention that at this point in his career, he was convinced that beings from another planet were trying to communicate with us paltry mortals through the medium of music, specifically loud, widdly scrang guitar music. He believed that, and I quote “….these little green men actually do exist, for they are part of the eternal past and venture from all regions of galaxy to find homage in our earths centre…” The chosen people, those that are “pure at heart” (usually widdly scrang guitar players) have these alien encounters imprinted on their subconscious but there knowledge will only become evident to a dying planet when our civilisation enters the new age of “light without heat-t-t-t-t-t-t” (you have to have the echo on that bit) and (although he doesn’t mention this) I presume that at this point we would all become one with one another and float off to the great golden guitar in the sky.
This song. What can I say about this song? What can you say about a song that goes “we know you came a long way, we hope that your ship is ok…we hope you’re going to stick around, maybe to save the day” “little green men, they look so funny, funny green men I want one to have and to hold, silly green men where do they come from should we run away should we start to play” with backing vocals which go (as far as I can determine….libble libble libble libble libble libble libble” apart from the fact that when he wrote it Vai had obviously been eating something much stronger than yellow snow.
Are you still reading this? You are? Damn. I thought you might have given up by now. In fact that was the plan. Write pages and pages of waffle in the vain hope that anyone reading it would have way better things to do with their day. There must be some fluff you can dig out of your navel? No? What about the cupboard under the sink? I bet it could do with a tidy? No? Oh bugger… It hasn’t worked. OK, well…I suppose I’m going to have to come clean and admit it then. It will probably the last thing I ever write because admitting to liking this song is so terrible that once I’ve writ the name I’ll be forced to kill myself. You think I’m joking? I’m not. I just hope you can all live with yourselves.
Put it this way. It’s worse than admitting that I like Tyrannosaurus Rex (I do) and I don’t mean the Get it on”, “Ride a white swan” T-Rex. although that’s brilliant too. I mean the bongo playing, songs played backwards, John Peel reading stories about Moles marigold comedown “my people were fair and had sky in their hair but now they’re content to wear stars on their brows” Tyrannosaurus Rex (God they don’t make album titles like that anymore - you can’t get the drugs).
It’s even worse than my coming clean about liking Toto(not that I do of course – I mention them purely as a comparision). How about admitting that I’ve got It Bites on my iPod? No. Ok Worse than that? I love Steve Miller especially the one that goes oh ah didididdy… (fly like an eagle) Does that satisfy your unnatural demand for my humiliation and demise?
Look, what if I told you that I liked Journey? Or Foreigner? Whichever one wrote that song that goes “I ain’t missing you at all – since you been gone away…” Actually I think that this song was written by Boston and therefore that means that I like Journey and Foreigner and Boston….because I like that song that goes “I see you in a smokey room, the smell of wine and cheap perfume”and I also like “jukebox hero”… enough of this!…have I not humiliated myself enough already?…oh God, death take me now.
Ok. If I’m going out, then I’m going out with a bang (an attitude which, some would say, started all my problems in the first place) Can I have a drum roll please? And some glitter?
The track I like, but would never admit to in public is…“Stonehenge” by Spinal Tap
I don’t mean that I like the scene in the film where the megalith is lowered to the stage in all its vertically challenged glory – although I do, and despite the fact I’ve seen the film so many times that I know the script (of the whole cast) it still makes me hurt from laughing. I make my no apologies for this fact. When you have a sense of humour that I prefer to call ephemeral and close friends describe as none – existent then you have to take your laughter where you may.
I mean I actually like the song. Not as a funny jokey spoof weird Al whateverhisname is sort of song – but as a proper song. I’m sorry. All your illusions about me as being gorgeous, hip and cool have finally been shattered. Live with it - I’ve had to (and for a lot longer).
Of course divulging this means that not only do I have to admit to liking a song that was written as a parody of a whole genre, but I also have to admit to liking the whole bloody genre. So here it is. The admission you’ve all been waiting for. I like Prog Rock. Are you satisfied? I hope so. Admitting this is more humiliating than being locked out of my own 21st birthday party for getting home too late, more embarassing than getting…actually, I’m not even going to go there - my toes are curling at just the thought of writing this and therefore transferring it from my subconcious where it normally just bubbles up to the surface at that lovely stage in the evening when you’ve finished your nightly spliff, turned out the light, wished F and the real Hendrix Cat (both of whom are already well into dreamland) good night and are about to settle down into a lovely coal stoned sleep but instead your mind whirls round picking up every single embarassing moment and playing it back to you in glorious technicolour.
I just hope that you’re all satisfied now.


